<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>clunkity &#187; drudgington post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.clunkity.com/tag/drudgington-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.clunkity.com</link>
	<description>this undertaking captures complexity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>100</title>
		<link>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/07/08/100/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/07/08/100/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drudgington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clunkity.com/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i currently have 100 followers on @drudgingtonpost.  took two months and zero effort.  not bad i guess.  lets see how far it goes without actually pushing it.  i&#8217;ve had a couple RTs&#8230;wish there were more.  its common that people follow, then unfollow quickly after.  i think people think they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i currently have 100 followers on <a href="http://twitter.com/drudgingtonpost">@drudgingtonpost</a>.  took two months and zero effort.  not bad i guess.  lets see how far it goes without actually pushing it.  i&#8217;ve had a couple RTs&#8230;wish there were more.  its common that people follow, then unfollow quickly after.  i think people think they are following the official tweets or something.  i scare them away.  according to <a href="http://twittercounter.com/compare/drudgingtonpost/all/followers/">twittercounter</a> i&#8217;m at a rate of 5 followers/day.  i guess?  seems high.  some other interesting stats at that page.  actually, the graph is retarded.  the spacing of dates on the x axis isn&#8217;t uniform.  wtf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/07/08/100/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>bump</title>
		<link>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/06/14/bump/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/06/14/bump/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drudgington post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clunkity.com/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[obama isn&#8217;t the number one word of the day for once! 
Drudge Report top 24h words: ahmadinejad obama us debate election iran its plan plutonium http://tr.im/l60J
Huffington Post top 24h words: mousavi ahmadinejad house under arrest iran latest updates cell http://tr.im/l60J
heck.  wasn&#8217;t even in theh top 10 for huffington post!  too bad it&#8217;s always [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obama isn&#8217;t the number one word of the day for once! <br/><br />
Drudge Report top 24h words: ahmadinejad obama us debate election iran its plan plutonium http://tr.im/l60J<br/><br />
Huffington Post top 24h words: mousavi ahmadinejad house under arrest iran latest updates cell http://tr.im/l60J<br/><br />
heck.  wasn&#8217;t even in theh top 10 for huffington post!  too bad it&#8217;s always bad news&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/06/14/bump/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>tweeting drudgington post</title>
		<link>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/05/03/tweeting-drudgington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/05/03/tweeting-drudgington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 01:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drudgington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clunkity.com/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i decided to start a twitter account for drudgington post.  just to post latest headlines and what not.  got to try out the twitter api.  straight forward.  we&#8217;ll see how much it actually works.  i&#8217;m worried about duplicated headlines.  need to figure out something more robust.  @drudgingtonpost.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i decided to start a twitter account for drudgington post.  just to post latest headlines and what not.  got to try out the twitter api.  straight forward.  we&#8217;ll see how much it actually works.  i&#8217;m worried about duplicated headlines.  need to figure out something more robust.  <a href="http://twitter.com/drudgingtonpost">@drudgingtonpost</a>.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/05/03/tweeting-drudgington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>swine flu</title>
		<link>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/04/27/swine-flu/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/04/27/swine-flu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drudgington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clunkity.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[all this swine flu news is really testing drudgington post.  and for once, a different word is on top, besides &#8220;obama&#8221;: &#8220;flu&#8221;!  at least in the 24 hours category.  its also nice to see common news across drudge report and huffington post.  we get more black words!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all this swine flu news is really testing <a href="http://drudgingtonpost.com">drudgington post</a>.  and for once, a different word is on top, besides &#8220;obama&#8221;: &#8220;flu&#8221;!  at least in the 24 hours category.  its also nice to see common news across drudge report and huffington post.  we get more black words!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/04/27/swine-flu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FairSpin</title>
		<link>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/04/20/fairspin/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/04/20/fairspin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drudgington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairspin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clunkity.com/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just saw a post on techcrunch about a site called FairSpin.  it&#8217;s a site that categorizes political bias within the news.  seems like an interesting concept.  i&#8217;m only posting this because it&#8217;s somewhat related to drudgington post.  trying to contrast headlines and words from opposite ends of the spectrum.  however, FairSpin seems a bit more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just saw a post on techcrunch about a site called <a href="http://fairspin.org/">FairSpin</a>.  it&#8217;s a site that categorizes political bias within the news.  seems like an interesting concept.  i&#8217;m only posting this because it&#8217;s somewhat related to <a href="http://drudgingtonpost.com">drudgington post</a>.  trying to contrast headlines and words from opposite ends of the spectrum.  however, FairSpin seems a bit more complicated.  it&#8217;s all based on user input, which i feel would be hard to maintain.  being completely based on users.  i&#8217;ll keep an eye on the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/04/20/fairspin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>chugging along</title>
		<link>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/04/08/chugging-along/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/04/08/chugging-along/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drudgington post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clunkity.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[not bad.  three weeks gone and drudgington post is still parsing fine.  no quick fixes needed.  i made a quick change to have it refresh the page every 15 minutes.  (data is grabbed every 15 minutes).
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not bad.  three weeks gone and <a href="http://drudgingtonpost.com">drudgington post</a> is still parsing fine.  no quick fixes needed.  i made a quick change to have it refresh the page every 15 minutes.  (data is grabbed every 15 minutes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/04/08/chugging-along/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>drudgington ponderings</title>
		<link>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/02/22/drudgington-ponderings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/02/22/drudgington-ponderings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drudgington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word cloud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clunkity.com/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[worked a little big on drudgington post.  had to make a few quick fixes.  i think i&#8217;m finishing up on it for now.  probably little tweaks here&#8230;filter some words there&#8230;but nothing big.  time to move on!  anyways, on to my ponderings&#8230;

one of which i have no idea what&#8217;s going on.  there seems to be a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>worked a little big on <a href="http://drudgingtonpost.com">drudgington post</a>.  had to make a few quick fixes.  i think i&#8217;m finishing up on it for now.  probably little tweaks here&#8230;filter some words there&#8230;but nothing big.  time to move on!  anyways, on to my ponderings&#8230;<br />
<span id="more-73"></span><br />
one of which i have no idea what&#8217;s going on.  there seems to be a misassignment in memory or something.  i&#8217;m editing an array for a word cloud.  print_f shows it as it&#8217;s supposed to be.  then i reference it (no editing or change or anything) and the last array value is incorrect.  not sure what&#8217;s going on.  so i just popped the last array entry off.  workarounds&#8230;  i decided to display the word clouds in frequency order.  it loses it&#8217;s &#8220;randomness&#8221; for a word cloud.  but this site is supposed to be clear and to the point.  &#8220;hey these are the top words they use&#8221;.  might sort them alphabetically&#8230;a compromise.  another dilemma i&#8217;ve run into is which words i should filter out.  nouns are usually straight forward.  but what about adjectives/modifiers or verbs or whatever they are (pff grammar).  like should i filter out the word &#8220;no&#8221;.  it&#8217;s a common word and is pretty useless without context.  but i feel like it deliniates tone.  like negative adjectives and what not.  but i&#8217;m beginning to see that keywords (mostly nouns) are going to dominate these adjectives anyways.  anyways, i&#8217;m done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/02/22/drudgington-ponderings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>drudgington post</title>
		<link>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/02/15/drudgington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/02/15/drudgington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drudgington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word cloud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.clunkity.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so one of my current projects is drudgington post.  you might be able to imagine what its like from the name.  combining huffington post with drudge report.  kinda.  it&#8217;s a place to compare these sites.  since they are the flagship news sites of their respective ends of the political spectrum, it&#8217;s interesting to see the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so one of my current projects is <a href="http://drudgingtonpost.com">drudgington post</a>.  you might be able to imagine what its like from the name.  combining <a href="http://huffingtonpost.com">huffington post</a> with <a href="http://drudgereport.com">drudge report</a>.  kinda.  it&#8217;s a place to compare these sites.  since they are the flagship news sites of their respective ends of the political spectrum, it&#8217;s interesting to see the differences.  so i&#8217;m saving off their headlines and seeing what i can do to compare them.  i shall talk about word clouds.<br />
<span id="more-65"></span><br />
this weekend i made some decent progress.  added word clouds from the headlines of each site.  i used an existing php function i found online and made a bunch of modifications.  such as how it limits the words it uses and how it calculates sizes.  i also made it compare the words between sites.  so if the word is unique to its site (not a major word in the other site) then it&#8217;s colored (blue or red).  common words are left as black (or gray).  one thing i noticed was that the word &#8220;obama&#8221; is used so much that it dwarfs all the other words.  i had to essentially have the function ignore the word to not skew all the results.  worked out pretty well.  better at least.  i am still in the process of creating the word block list.  it&#8217;ll probably be done along the way as i see words useless words pop up.  i dont want to prematurely apply a predefined list.  id rather see the words in context to decide if i want to remove it or not.<br />
<br />
some issues.  right now it looks like some words sometimes don&#8217;t make it into the word cloud.  like the word &#8220;obama&#8221; will occasionally disappear.  i have to look into that.  another thing i would like to look into is combining words that are the same but in a different form.  like combine &#8220;vote&#8221; and &#8220;votes&#8221;.  and what about popular two word combinations?  like &#8220;white&#8221; and &#8220;house&#8221;.  can i make it know it&#8217;s &#8220;white house&#8221;?<br />
<br />
well that&#8217;s it for word clouds.  i&#8217;ll make a different post describing the general background of drudgington post soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.clunkity.com/2009/02/15/drudgington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
